The Globe as you know it is changing.
Coming June 2019

  • More thought-provoking stories that inspire
  • Independent, free and member-supported
  • Vote for, pitch and commission stories
  • Member engagement with our journalists

To understand more about why you are so important to our member-supported initiative, we encourage you to read the following from our managing editor ~ Read more

The Globe as you know it is changing.

Since 2007, Southeast Asia Globe has been a space for some of the region’s best writers and photographers to take our readers behind the headlines into the stories that shape people’s lives. Every month, you could expect to pick up our latest print edition and find high-quality journalism, analysis and artwork waiting on every page. And since 2007, we’ve fought to uphold our promise of quality and independence to you, our readers.

But, like we said, the world is changing. Print publications just aren’t reaching the audiences they need to fulfil their promise of informing, educating and entertaining the public. Advertisers continue to invest in digital platforms while printing costs creep ever higher. Print may not be dead, but it’s fighting for its life. And we’re tired of waiting by a sickbed for its condition to improve. We want to be present at the birth of something new.

That’s why Southeast Asia Globe is relaunching as a member-driven platform featuring daily long-form features combining world-class journalism with enthralling art design and data-centered tech. Through our core pillars – Power, Money, Life and Earth – we are focusing in on the central issues that our readers have always engaged with most, with the same in-depth coverage of politics, business, social affairs and the environment that you’ve come to expect since 2007.

But leaving print behind us doesn’t just save our backs from lugging stacks of magazines across Southeast Asia. It opens up a global readership who don’t just want to read the news, but have a say in the stories that we tell and the way that we tell them. We’re not asking you to take out another magazine subscription – our stories are open to all. What we’re offering our members is a space where they can pitch and vote on the stories that they think deserve to be told. We want to inspire an engaged and active community of members who vote for, comment on and contribute to the stories that matter most to them. We want to work with our members to curate the way they engage with the news – not just as readers, but as an active extension of our editorial team.

That’s how we’re changing to bring you great stories. Here’s how we’re not.

We’re independent. Always have been, always will be. We’re not owned by any corporation or aligned with any state. We choose the stories that we tell, and the way that we tell them.

We’re creative. We’re not interested in churning out breaking news stories on the hour, every hour. We believe that the best stories are the ones that come alive on the page, digging deeper into the issues that shape Southeast Asia – and bringing you along for the ride. From our dedicated designers to our new software development team, our commitment is to constantly challenge ourselves to find new ways of reaching out to our readers.

We’re open. Challenging governments, NGOs and businesses to be transparent with the public means nothing if we keep our own readers in the dark. That’s why we will be completely open about why we tell the stories that we tell – and how we pay for them. Work with us to build something that endures where many media fail, and decide with us exactly where that money is going.

Above all, we’re optimistic. And yeah, we know what you’re thinking. Faced with impending climate collapse, the rise of right-wing authoritarian governments across the world, widening wealth and income inequality and deepening divisions rooted in race or gender or creed, it’s hard not to open the papers and feel the weight of the world pressing down. But we wouldn’t be doing this if we didn’t believe that when people work together, they can make their little corner of the world a more just, open and equal place.

And that’s why we can’t do this without you. We believe that across the globe is a community of people who care deeply about social justice, environmental action and press freedom – and who will join in to help make those ideals a reality. We’re not just holding our hand out – we need your voice to play a vital role in building Southeast Asia Globe into a leading space for progressive causes in the region. Tell us what stories the mainstream media is missing. Share with us the causes that matter most to you, and how we can champion those causes not just across Southeast Asia, but the world.

Our vision is clear. By 2025, we want to be recognised for building a great space for outstanding journalists from across the region to explore new ways of telling Southeast Asia’s most vital stories. Let’s bring together a community of engaged and loyal members who want to help reshape the media rather than just read it. And we want to reach a point where our readers, not advertisers, are the ones working to support our shared vision of an inclusive media.

We can’t do this without you. Let’s get together and build something that we all believe in.

If you’re interested in joining us, sign up to our newsletter, like us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter. And watch this space.

The Orchid Project / Why ending all forms of FGC is vital for gender equality

By: Robin Spiess - Posted on: March 9, 2019 | Featured

Though not often talked about, there are a handful of countries in Southeast Asia where the widely-condemned practice of female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) is thriving – and Singapore is one of them. Southeast Asia Globe contacted the Orchid Project, a British charity working to end FGM/C around the globe, to discuss the need for change in Singapore and beyond

Read our in-depth investigation into the activists fighting to end FGM/C in Singapore.

A young Indonesian girl crying as doctors perform a circumcision on her in Bandung, Indonesia Photo: Adek Berry / AFP

Does Orchid Project have any updated information on the prevalence of FGM/C in Southeast Asia, or a potential rise in the number of cases?
Data on FGC in the Southeast Asian region is limited, which presents a barrier to ending the practice as the scale of the issue is unknown. Indonesia recently started reporting on the number of girls between 0 and 14 who’ve undergone FGC: 49%. UNICEF predicts that a further 15 million girls will undergo the cut between 2015 and 2030 in Indonesia alone. It’s essential that we improve data and research on prevalence across the Asian continent to understand the full scale of the issue in order to support change.

Why does Orchid Project believe the Singaporean government has still made no moves to limit the practice of FGM/C in the country?
While legislation against FGC can demonstrate a government’s commitment to ending the practice, we have seen examples in other countries where enforcement of the law has driven cutting underground. In Kenya for example, Orchid Project has anecdotally heard that girls are being cut at younger ages and in secret to avoid detection from authorities after a clamp down in some regions.

We’ve also seen, through the work of our grassroots partners in West Africa, East Africa and India, that the most effective method of supporting FGC abandonment is through programmes that are driven and devised by communities themselves and that recognise cutting as a social norm and a violation of human rights. When communities lead change and have access to information about their human rights and responsibilities, that’s when we’re seeing positive progress.

Of course, governments do have a role to play in supporting the movement to end FGC. We hope to see leaders, policymakers and politicians in Singapore and the world over being advocates for change, and channeling resources and investment into grassroots work to end cutting.

Many supporters of FGC/M in Singapore argue that the form of cutting practised in the country is fairly harmless. How would Orchid Project respond to this sentiment?
The most important thing to note in the face of arguments that some types of female genital cutting (FGC) are “less harmful” is that the practice is a human rights issue. Cutting is a violation of human, child and women’s rights, no matter how, where or why it occurs. Claims that type 1 and 4 FGC are harmless are incorrect; the practice is dangerous to women and girls’ health, regardless of the type of cut that is carried out.

While some survivors may not experience the health consequences of cutting, all types of cutting carry risks and can often lead to physical and psychological impacts such as severe blood loss, scarring, infections, post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. Furthermore, FGC is most often carried out to control and suppress female sexuality, and the increasing medicalisation of cutting in countries such as Singapore legitimises a discriminatory practice that both underpins and reinforces gender inequality.

Medicalisation of the practice is an issue around the world. Globally, 26% of girls and women report being cut by a medical professional, a trend which presents an increasing concern to activists and civil society working to end the practice. Orchid Project’s research in Somaliland found that medical practitioners often face decision-making dilemmas when parents ask for their daughters to undergo FGC, as they understand the negative health impacts of the practice but fear girls being taken to be cut in unsterile conditions if they refuse. These findings suggest that engagement with health professionals on this issue could be impactful in shifting the norm around cutting as part of an approach that also involves the whole community on the issue.

Are there any other countries that have tackled the issue of FGC (with community outreach or with increased regulation) that could serve as positive examples for Singapore moving forward on this issue?
Through our work with partners at the grassroots in West Africa, East Africa and India, Orchid Project has seen that the social norm of FGC can shift when whole communities are given the space to discuss their experiences around the practice. It’s key that the voices of women, men and youth are heard, so everyone is invested in abandoning FGC and sees the benefit for the whole community. Within this, it is also important to meaningfully engage with individuals who have traditionally been custodians of the practice, such as religious and cultural leaders, or with those who have influential roles, such as teachers and health practitioners.

Research on FGC in Singapore is limited, however reports and anecdotal evidence suggest that two key challenges in this context are medicalisation of the practice and misconceptions that it is a religious requirement.

A declaration ceremony in northern Senegal, 2017, where communities came together to publicly declare an end to FGC Photo: the Orchid Project

In West Africa, our partner Tostan has worked with progressive religious leaders who have become advocates for ending FGC. They talk with communities directly and through media outlets like radio shows, using excerpts from the Quran and aligning them with human rights to demonstrate that abandonment of FGC aligns with Islamic values. Nearly 9,000 communities across West Africa have left FGC behind through Tostan’s work. This serves as an example of how pioneering religious leaders can become agents for change in the movement to end FGC.

Most recently, our Kenyan partner SAFE Maa’s work resulted in 3,000 Massai coming together to publicly declare an end to FGC on 6th February 2019, International Day to End FGC. This historic day was the culmination of years of work and conversations within the community. SAFE’s work included bringing 42 cultural leaders together to discuss and bless an alternative rite of passage, which will now allow girls to graduate into womanhood without undergoing the cut, while retaining non-harmful aspects of Maasai culture.

Why is it so important to ensure that FGC is eradicated around the globe?
If the world is to reach its common goals of improving gender equality and women’s rights, it’s vital that we prioritise ending FGC. Cutting intersects with a multitude of gender inequalities, such as child marriage, poor access to education and economic exclusion.

Almost every country in which FGC occurs is in the bottom quintile of the Human Development Index; in most cases, they are also countries with the highest projected birth rate over the next decade. UNICEF predicts that, despite falling rates of FGC in many countries, population growth means that up to 68 million more girls could be cut between 2015 and 2030 if efforts are not accelerated.

The good news is that progress is being already made. The UNICEF-UNFPA joint programme on FGC reported last year that over 21,000 villages have publicly declared abandonment of the practice across 17 African countries. UNICEF states that a girl is a third less likely to be cut today than she was three decades ago. We must do more to accelerate this progress to reach our goal of ending FGC by 2030. For the practice to end, we need commitment, leadership and policy from global leaders, research that shows the true scale of the issue around the world, and support and resources for effective approaches that create sustainable change at the grassroots community level.